Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Comment: Migrated to Confluence 5.3

This article describes various reasons that can lead to nonzero moment at abutment location of bridge objects.

On this page

Nonzero moment due longitudinal restraint

When bearing links are located at the bottom of the girder, and have nonzero stiffness in the longitudinal direction, this results in longitudinal force acting on a lever arm about the neutral axis of the section. This is kinematically correct behavior. Releasing the abutment bearing links in the longitudinal direction (U3) should produce zero moment at the abutments. For stability, ensure that the model has a longitudinal restraint, such as at one abutment or bent.

To avoid removing a longitudinal restraint, set the bearing elevation to the neutral axis of the superstructure section. This decouples longitudinal and bending behavior, though it may not be physically realistic.

Nonzero moment due abutment skew

Nonzero abutment moment can be caused also by abutment skew, because the total abutment moment is obtained by summing up all reactions about a line perpendicular to the layout line at the abutment location. If the loading is not symmetrical, the total moment may be nozero, because reactions closer to the more heavily loaded portion of the bridge are contributing more moment than the other reactions.

For results reported for individual girders, the moments reported on the "Bridge Object Response Display" form are obtained from section cuts that include both the girder and the tributary section of the deck. When there is a skew at the abutment, the skew also causes twisting of the deck and the interaction with the adjacent girder or the deck of the adjacent girder may cause negative section cut moment at the abutment. In other words, the reported moment is not solely caused by the vertical reaction at the support, but the contribution of all joints included in the section cut must be accounted for.

Hidden content

Related Incidents:

  • Incident
    no56378
    commentExplanation of nonzero abutment moment due to skew
    • Email
      date8/14/2013
      subjectNonzero moment at skewed abutment
      fromac
      comment
      took
      id12517976

  • Incident
    no102307
    commentNonzero girder moment at skewed abutments

See also

Hidden content

Related Incidents:

  • Incident
    no25410
    commentLarge longitudinal reactions for simply supported (pin-roller) bridge model with only vertical loads applied. Explanation: this is due to constraint provided by the deck. See 6/15/2010 email reply.
  • Incident
    no39862
    commentNegative moments at abutment of simply supported by highly skewed bridge
    • Email
      date11/7/2011
      subjectNegative moments at abutment of simply supported by highly skewed bridge
      fromok
      comment
      tors
      id8093768