You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Page History

« Previous Version 25 Next »

Error formatting macro: live-template: java.lang.NullPointerException


This test problem demonstrates the difference between body constraints and equal constraints, as applied to a simply supported beam model. The primary difference between these constraint types is that DOF are coupled when a body constraint is applied. This causes the constrained joints to translate and rotate as a rigid body.

Modeling

A simply supported beam is modeled once with body constraints joining the beam to its supports, then again with equal constraints. Geometric configuration is shown in Figure 1:


Unknown macro: {center-text}

Figure 1 - Structural configuration

Analysis

Once each system is subjected to a uniform distributed load, analysis generates the results shown in Figures 2-4:


Unknown macro: {center-text}

Figure 2 - Deflected configuration


Unknown macro: {center-text}

Figure 3 - Shear response


Unknown macro: {center-text}

Figure 4 - Moment response

Commentary

Conclusions may be drawn as follows:

  • From the deflected shape of the first beam, it is evident that the support and the coincident-beam joints rotate as a rigid body, allowing the beam to effectively span between the actual supports.
  • As seen in the deflected shape of the second beam, beam end-joints do not deflect downward. This is because the equal constraint, applied to the UZ direction, constrains joint displacement with that of the support, which is zero. This produces a stiffer system in that the beam effectively spans between its end joints, and not the support joints.

Attachments

  • No labels