General Topics   SAP2000   CSiBridge   ETABS   SAFE   PERFORM-3D   CSiCOL   Tutorials   Test Problems   Documentation   Licensing
##### Page tree
Go to start of banner

# Thin vs. Thick shells

You are viewing an old version of this page. View the current version.

Version 5

## What is the difference between thin and thick shell formulations?

Answer: The inclusion of transverse shear deformation in plate-bending behavior is the main difference between thin and thick shell formulation. Thin-plate formulation follows a Kirchhoff application, which neglects transverse shear deformation, whereas thick-plate formulation follows Mindlin/Reissner, which does account for shear behavior. Thick-plate formulation has no effect upon membrane (in-plane) behavior, only plate-bending (out-of-plane) behavior.

Shear deformation tends to be important when shell thickness is greater than approximately 1/5 to 1/10 of the span of plate-bending curvature. Shearing may also become significant in locations of bending-stress concentrations, which occur near sudden changes in thickness or support conditions, and near openings or re-entrant corners. Thick-plate formulation is best for such applications.

Thick-plate formulation is also recommended in general because it tends to be more accurate, though slightly stiffer, even for thin-plate bending problems where shear deformation is truly negligible. However, the accuracy of thick-plate formulation is sensitive to mesh distortion and large aspect ratios, and therefore should not be used in such cases when shear deformation is known to be small.

In general, the contribution of shear deformation becomes significant when ratio between the span of plate-bending curvature and thickness is approximately 20:1 or 10:1. The formulation itself is adequate for ratio down to 5:1 or 4:1. In that this ratio is dependent upon the projected span of curvature, shell thickness may be greater than the actual plan dimensions of a shell object.

### Stiffness for pure bending deformations

The statement that thick shells tend to be stiffer than thin shells applies only the bending portion of the shell element deformation and for meshing that is too coarse.

For a mesh which is adequate to capture bending deformation accurately, the thick-shell element will be more flexible because of the additional deformation due to shear that is not represented by the thin-shell formulation. However, for pure bending deformation, the thin-shell element is a little more accurate, hence for coarser meshes the thick shell element may be stiffer. As the mesh is refined, this effect diminishes.

Stresses are more important than deflections for most problems. Where shear deformation can be expected to be important, we recommend the thick-shell element because it will better capture the stress distribution. This is the case not only for shells that are simply thicker, but also near holes and other geometrical discontinuities where transverse shear deformation develops.

• No labels